Encloud Solutions
Let's talk ↗
View all services
Recognized for
ZohoHubSpotaws
Spotlight
CASE STUDY
Read the case study

Your model works in a notebook.
Make it work in production.

We build the rails that take models from one data scientist’s laptop to versioned, monitored, retrainable production systems, training pipelines, model registries, CI/CD with evaluation gates, and serving infrastructure on AWS that doesn’t torch your GPU budget.
40+
models moved from notebook to production
18 min
median merge-to-production for a model change
57%
avg. GPU serving cost cut after right-sizing
Release pipeline
main · build #482
DEPLOYING
Docker
Build
Image pushed to registry
2m 04s
GitHub Actions
Test
612 passed, 0 flaky
4m 12s
Kubernetes
Staging
Smoke checks green
1m 30s
aws
Production
Rolling 3 / 6 nodes
live
GUARDSzero_downtime · auto_rollback · signed_images
14
deploys per week
8 min
commit to prod
0.4%
change failure
Teams running models in production with Encloud
helix&comeridianBLUESUMMITVANTAGEStratos

Most ML projects die in the gap
between notebook and production.

Four failure modes stall almost every ML effort we’re called into. Our whole practice exists to close them, permanently, not per-model.
01NOTEBOOK
The model lives on one person’s laptop
Training data pulled by hand, hyperparameters in someone’s head, no record of which data produced which weights. When that data scientist is on vacation, or gone, nobody can retrain, reproduce or even rerun the thing.
02DEPLOYS
Shipping a model change takes weeks of hand-runs
No CI/CD for models means every release is a manual copy: export weights, SSH to a box, restart a script, hope. Deploys are so painful they happen quarterly, so the production model is always months behind the best one.
03DRIFT
Accuracy decays silently after launch
The model that scored 94% at launch quietly degrades as customer behavior, prices and inputs shift. Without drift and performance monitoring, the first alert is a business owner asking why the predictions got weird.
04BURN
GPU bills grow faster than usage
Always-on GPU instances serving a handful of requests per minute, training jobs on on-demand pricing, no autoscaling, no quantization. AI infrastructure built in a hurry routinely costs 3–5x what the workload needs.

Our fix: treat models like software you ship.

A model is code plus data plus weights, so it deserves version control, automated tests, staged rollouts and monitoring, the same as any production system. We bring the discipline of our AWS and CI/CD practice to machine learning: everything versioned, every deploy repeatable, every model watched.
Pressure-test your ML setup →
01
Version everything, data, code and weights
Every training run logs its dataset hash, parameters and metrics to an experiment tracker; every promoted model lands in a registry with lineage back to the exact data that made it. Reproducibility stops depending on memory.
Experiment trackingModel registryData versioning
02
CI/CD for models, with evaluation gates
A merged PR triggers training, an automated eval suite against a held-out benchmark, and a canary rollout, with instant rollback to the previous registry version. Shipping a better model becomes a Tuesday, not a project.
Eval gatesCanary rolloutOne-click rollback
03
Monitor the model, not just the server
Uptime dashboards don’t catch a model going stale. We watch input drift, prediction distributions and business-metric feedback loops, and wire alerts to retraining triggers, so degradation is caught in days, not quarters.
Drift detectionPerformance dashboardsRetraining triggers
04
Right-size the infrastructure
Spot instances for training, autoscaling and scale-to-zero for serving, ONNX and quantization where they buy latency, CPU where GPU is vanity. Cost per prediction goes on a dashboard next to accuracy, both are engineering targets.
Spot trainingAutoscaled servingCost per prediction

MLOps services, notebook to production

All AI & data services
01
MLOps Readiness Audit
Maturity scorecardRisk registerRanked roadmap
02
Training Pipelines & Orchestration
Pipeline refactorScheduled retrainingSpot-instance trainingArtifact versioning
03
Experiment Tracking & Model Registry
Run trackingModel lineageStage promotionAudit trail
04
Feature Stores & Data Versioning
Feature store designDVC pipelinesSkew checks
05
CI/CD for Models
Eval gatesCanary deploysRollback runbookIaC with Terraform
06
Model Serving Infrastructure
Real-time & batch APIsAutoscaling & scale-to-zeroONNX optimizationGPU right-sizing
07
Drift & Performance Monitoring
Drift dashboardsAlert routingFeedback loopsRetraining triggers
08
LLMOps & Eval Pipelines
Prompt versioningEval harnessesRegression suitesToken-cost dashboards

How a model reaches production

Five stages, each with named deliverables. Hover a stage to see what you get.
01
/ 05
Audit
01Audit the path from data to prediction
We trace how a model gets made and shipped today, data sources, notebook state, deployment steps, monitoring gaps, GPU spend. Everything scored and ranked by risk, so the plan targets what actually blocks production.
MLOps maturity scorecardCost baselineRanked roadmap
02Make the model reproducible
The notebook becomes a versioned training pipeline: data pinned with DVC, runs logged to an experiment tracker, the current production model registered with full lineage. Anyone on the team can now retrain and get the same weights.
Versioned training pipelineRegistered baseline modelReproducibility check
03Build the CI/CD rails
Merged code triggers training, an automated eval suite against an agreed benchmark, and staged promotion through the registry. Evaluation gates are defined with your team, what “good enough to ship” means gets written down.
CI/CD pipelineEval gate definitionsBenchmark suite
04Deploy with a canary and a dashboard
Serving infrastructure goes live on AWS, autoscaled, load-tested, cost-benchmarked, behind a canary rollout. Drift and performance monitoring ship the same day as the model, never as a fast-follow that never comes.
Production serving stackDrift dashboardsRollback runbook
05Hand over the keys, stay on call
Your team is trained on the pipelines, runbooks and dashboards until they ship a model change without us watching. Retraining cadence gets tuned against real drift data, and 30 days of hypercare backstops the transition.
Team handover & trainingRetraining playbook30-day hypercare

MLOps outcomes in spotlight

All case studies
Churn model stuck in a notebook for 9 months, live in 6 weeks
B2B SaaSCI/CD for Models
helix&co
18 minmerge to production, from 3 weeks
Client portrait
Our data scientist built something genuinely good and it just sat there. Encloud built the rails, now we ship a better model every sprint.
Priya Raman
RevOps Director, Helix
Vision model drift caught in 2 days instead of a lost quarter
ManufacturingDrift Monitoring
meridian
2 daysto detect and retrain on drift
Client portrait
A camera swap on the line shifted our defect model’s inputs overnight. The dashboard flagged it before QA did, retraining kicked off automatically.
Ingrid Vasquez
Head of Quality, Meridian Manufacturing
GPU serving costs cut 57% at higher traffic
LogisticsServing Infrastructure
VANTAGE
-57%GPU spend, +40% request volume
Client portrait
ONNX, autoscaling and spot training did what a year of “we should look at that bill” never did. Cost per prediction is on a dashboard next to accuracy.
Tomas Lindqvist
VP Engineering, Vantage Logistics
Credit-risk models passed regulator review on lineage alone
Financial ServicesModel Registry & Governance
BLUESUMMIT
100%of models with full audit lineage
Client portrait
Every production model traces to the exact data, code and approval that made it. The audit that used to take weeks of screenshots took an afternoon.
Alicia Fontaine
Chief Risk Officer, BlueSummit
LLM support assistant shipped with a real eval pipeline
HealthcareLLMOps
Caremont
312regression evals on every prompt change
Client portrait
Prompt changes used to be vibes. Now every edit runs the eval suite before it touches patients’ questions, and token spend stopped surprising finance.
Dr. Omar Sadiq
Digital Health Lead, Caremont Health

Put ML platform engineers on the problem, not another notebook.

ML engineer, platform engineer and delivery lead working in your repos and your AWS account from week one. The same pod stays through handover and beyond.
40+
Models running in production on rails we built
4 wks
Typical time to a first model shipping through CI/CD
0
Clients still deploying models by hand after we leave

The stack we run in production

Open standards first, everything versioned, everything replaceable, nothing that locks your models to us.
Training & tracking
Pipelines & orchestration
Serving & infrastructure
Monitoring & delivery
LLMOps
Frameworks your team already uses, wired into experiment tracking and versioned data.
PyTorchPyTorch
TensorFlowTensorFlow
MLflowMLflow
W&BWeights & Biases
DVCDVC

Book an MLOps readiness review, not a sales call.

45 minutes with an ML platform engineer. Bring your repo, your notebook or just your AWS bill, leave with a maturity scorecard, the three fixes worth doing first, and an honest read on whether you need MLOps or just a managed service.
No obligation, no prepared pitch
NDA on request before you share code or data
Honest "use SageMaker" advice when that’s the right answer
You own every pipeline, dashboard and runbook we build
4.9 / 5average across 120+ engagements
The readiness review told us plainly which half of our plan we didn’t need. The half we built has shipped a model change every sprint since.
Priya Raman
RevOps Director, Helix
Tell us about your models
I'm okay with Encloud contacting me about this request. No newsletters, no list-selling. *
Book my session ↗
We reply within one business day. Your details never leave Encloud.

Frequently asked questions

Weighing MLOps consulting against hiring, or building against a managed platform? Bring the question to a readiness review and get an answer backed by your own stack.
Talk to an ML platform engineer →
Our data scientist built a great model in a notebook. What’s the path to production?+
Reproduce, automate, ship, in that order. We first turn the notebook into a versioned training pipeline with pinned data and a registered baseline model, then add CI/CD with evaluation gates, then deploy behind a canary with drift monitoring from day one. For a single model that path typically takes four to eight weeks, and your data scientist keeps working in the tools they know.
Should we build our own MLOps stack or just use SageMaker?+
Sometimes SageMaker or another managed platform is genuinely the right answer, and we’ll say so in the readiness review. Managed wins for small teams with standard workloads; open tooling like MLflow, Airflow and Kubernetes wins when you need custom serving, multi-cloud portability or tight cost control at scale. Most of our builds are a pragmatic mix, managed where it’s commodity, open where it’s your edge.
How do you monitor model drift in production?+
Three layers: input drift (are today’s features distributed like the training data?), prediction drift (has the output distribution shifted?), and delayed ground truth (how did predictions actually score once outcomes arrived?). We implement these with Evidently, Prometheus and Grafana, route alerts to named owners, and wire sustained drift to retraining triggers rather than a dashboard nobody opens.
How often should we retrain our models?+
On evidence, not on a calendar. Some models drift in days, others hold for a year, the monitoring data tells you which one you have. We set up scheduled retraining as a safety net, drift-triggered retraining as the primary mechanism, and evaluation gates so a retrained model only ships if it actually beats the incumbent on your benchmark.
Our GPU costs are out of control. Can you fix that without hurting accuracy?+
Usually, yes, most AI infrastructure we audit runs 3–5x over what the workload needs. The levers are spot instances for training, autoscaling and scale-to-zero for serving, ONNX conversion and quantization for latency, batching, and moving low-traffic models to CPU. Every change is benchmarked against your accuracy and latency budgets before it ships, and cost per prediction goes on a dashboard so it stays fixed.
Can our own team run this after you leave?+
That’s the exit criterion for every engagement. Handover means your engineers ship a model change end to end, pipeline, eval, deploy, rollback, with us watching, not driving. You get runbooks, architecture docs and a retraining playbook, everything lives in your repos and your AWS account, and 30 days of hypercare backstops the transition. A retainer afterwards is optional, never required.
How do LLM applications change MLOps?+
The unit of change shifts from model weights to prompts, retrieval configuration and orchestration code, but the discipline is the same. LLMOps means versioning prompts like code, running automated eval and regression suites on every change, tracking token cost and latency per feature, and monitoring output quality with judges and user feedback. If you’re shipping on Claude or OpenAI, this is the difference between a demo and a product.
What does an MLOps engagement cost, and how long does it take?+
The readiness review is fixed-price. A first model through full rails, pipeline, registry, CI/CD, monitoring, handover, is typically a six-to-ten-week fixed project depending on how much of your data foundation already exists. Platform buildouts for multiple models are scoped after the review. No percentage-of-cloud-spend fees, and you own everything we build.

Latest insights

Read all posts